Musings

Weekly Musing: Write Long and Prosper?

I didn’t know until May 26th that May is Short Story Month and only because I received an e-mail from a Anne R. Allen’s blog . In the article, it extolled the advantages of writing short stories vs. novels.

Some of the points in the article got me thinking about my own writing aspirations as well as the pro-short story arguments.

Personally, I love novels. I guess it’s because I’ve always had an attention span. I love the build-up. I will stick with a story if it is paced just right even epic, behemoth novels. I need and want that background. I need the time to have the characters fleshed out. I can read a novel faster than I can a short story collection. With a short story collection, I find myself flipping through the pages more to see when the story will end. I will groan if I see that it doesn’t end for a while. I guess I could just skip to the next story but I have this odd thing that I should finish a story. The author put in all that time and effort, the least I can do is finish a 10 page story. For example, it took me about 2.5 weeks to get through a 177 page short story collection. In comparison, a 260 page book I got through in about 8 hours. Naturally some of this is due to the content of the story itself.

The biggest reason for the resurgence of short-stories is due to people’s decreasing attention spans coupled with many small screen digital devices. Short stories and flash fiction, an even shorter story, are easily digestible. That’s fine however, I’m not sure encouraging people to become even less engaged in long-term critical thinking is a good thing. We are already far too much of a disposable society. When it comes to something I feel is as sacred as the written word, shorter isn’t always better. I’m not saying all short stories are poorly written or can’t say anything, then can and do, but it dismays me to see further erosion into ‘this bores me already’ culture. It’s a further dumbing down and boosts short-term gratification.

In my opinion, novellas and novels more fully engage the reader to think deeper about the characters, issues, themes, plots, and subplots. More subtext can be developed. A reader can take the necessary time to appreciate what is going on. With a short story, you read the story then move on. It’s just an appetizer and if you feast solely upon appetizers, you will never get full. Whereas a novella or novel, I can have an appetizer, move through several courses, and then have dessert; a much more satisfying experience. It will stay with me longer. And maybe even give me heartburn.

As a beginning writer, I view composing short stories as training wheels. I need to cut my teeth and learn how to craft all the elements that go into a story. Writing short stories allows me to do that. It helps build my confidence in what my abilities are before I tackle a novel, the writing form I’m most interested in. One point mentioned in the article noted above is the author’s own admission of viewing short story writing as just practice before graduating to novels. For me, I equate it with learning to crawl before being able to walk and run. I don’t feel my skill level is up to tackling a full-blown novel. There are too many things to think about and to practice but then again, I’m a pretty cautious person.

Another advantage I am finding to writing short stories is the ability to play with different genres. I believe as I’ve mentioned in one of my first posts, I’m a fan of different genres; I’ll read anything if it sounds interesting so why should I limit myself to just one? It’s about the story, not the category it fits into. And with short stories, I can do that. I just finished a Victorian vampire story but I’ve also written a Steampunk-inspired pirate story, a story inspired the bombing of Hiroshima, a priest reflecting back to an incident in his childhood in Spain, and a reanimated corpse stuck in a county morgue, to mention just a few.

The idea, though, of sticking strictly to short stories, has never crossed my mind. True, writing a short story takes a much shorter commitment of overall time than a novel does. And it is more efficient in terms of per year production. And it probably is a more lucrative way to make money as an author, but my heart loves novels. Maybe it sounds pretentious or naïve, but a good majority of the story ideas I have saved on my hard drive feel like they require a few hundred pages to be developed properly. Perhaps I’m just a glutton for punishment.

Musings

Weekly Musings: Whose Genre Is It Anyway?

What is a genre? A genre is category, type, or class of literature. Sounds simple enough but in reality is complicated and can be confusing for the writer and, perhaps, even for the reader.

Classifying genres starts out simply enough: Fiction and Nonfiction.

Within fiction, the broad categories are:

Drama
Tragedy
Comedy
Tragicomedy

Ahhh, but let’s add more like it was seven-layer dip.

Fiction has the following sub-genres:

Adventure
Romance
Crime
Mystery
Fantasy
Fiction Narrative
Fiction in Verse
Historical Fiction
Horror
Humor
Poetry
Realistic Fiction
Literary Fiction
Science Fiction
Westerns

But wait! There’s more! Let’s get more sub-sub genres within fiction.

This is an extremely small list:

Absurdist
Men’s Adventure
Children’s Literature
Romantic Comedy
Parody
Black Comedy
Experimental
Erotica
Historical
Historical Romance
Regency Romance
Literary
Metafiction
Philosophical
Political Satire
Pulp
Religious
Family Saga
Speculative
Steampunk
Cyberpunk
Dystopian
Alternative History
Paranormal
Monster Literature
Supernatural
Comic Fantasy
Dark Fantasy
High Fantasy
Historical Fantasy
Low Fantasy
Urban Fantasy
Crime
Detective
Chick-Lit
Melodrama
Legal Thriller
Medical Thriller
Political Thriller

You get the idea. And this isn’t including works that borrow from multiple genres.

Within nonfiction, the broad categories are:

Biography/Autobiography
Essay
Speech
Textbooks

And here comes the sub-genres within nonfiction:

Creative nonfiction
Memoir
Diaries and Journals
History
Letters
Religious text

Clearly, nonfiction is less taxing to classify.

As readers, we tend to gravitate towards one type of book over another, one author over another. But what happens when your favorite author wants to expand and try a different genre out? One of my favorite authors, Ken Follett, has written a nonfiction book On Wings of Eagles about Ross Perot’s involvement in retrieving two of his employees who had been falsely arrested during a revolution in Tehran, Iran back in the late 1970s. Follett is most well-known for historical fiction set during WWII and the Middle Ages but has written more modern novels such as Paper Money (written under a pseudonym in the 1970s) and The Hammer of Eden. Naturally when an author becomes extremely well-known, their publisher isn’t as concerned about how to market the book. All they have to say is ‘New book from Big Famous Author XYZ’ and fans will buy it.

Our reasons are as varied as the types of books available and book publishers know this. Genre classifications allow book publishers to know how to market a book to the correct audience.

But what about books that cross genres? A book that spans several generations, for example. Say it starts off during the American Revolution and ends with the family as it is today. Is that considered historical fiction or just general fiction? Is it a percentage of the content of the book that determines the dominate genre? The job of making this determination is usually left to the marketing department of a book publishing company however, if you are self-publishing, you generally have a good idea what category your work falls into.

So do genre classifications help or hinder a writer’s creativity? Worrying about what neat little box one’s work falls into while writing it can only hinder. And bring up the dreaded writers gremlin salivating on your shoulder as it peers down on your work, ready to pick the story apart. Let the words, characters, settings, and plots flow. Get it down onto paper or computer screen and don’t worry about its box until the time comes to publish it.

I personally am interested in writing historical fiction; it’s what I love to read the most and I have a lot of fun doing the research. But a lot of story ideas I’ve jotted down aren’t historical fiction. I love to read different types of books and authors, so why should I limit myself to one particular genre? The characters drive the piece not sitting around fretting about what genre the story fits.